This is an example me being neurotic about a term:
I’m not a fan of the term “hacking” and the way we apply it to things. Life-hacks, kitchen-hacks, education-hacks, etc. I understand the context it’s being used in. It’s meant as a shortcut, or time-saving tip. The word hack originally means to cut something with rough or heavy blows. The term was more popularized with computer hacking; the exploiting of a weakness in a system.
Hacking is ungraceful. Exploitation is unfair.
I like how Reddit calls these so-called life hacks, Life Pro Tips (LPT). So let’s just say this is one of my Education Pro Tips (EPT). I think I’m going to start that hashtag. #educationprotips
Thus begins my take on how to assess and grade students in a way that I believe to be fair, consistent, and understandable.
I know I just wrote a post against grading. That post was my about larger belief of how an education system that focuses on content acquisition and “teaching to the test” is sucking the meaning out of grades, and worse, the fun out of learning.
The presentation below is my rationale and method for making observations, gathering data, and reporting student learning based their skills, not scores. I am fortunate to teach in Manitoba, Canada, where there is not a focus of specific content. Rather, skills are the focus of the curriculum and reporting of English Language Arts.
This may not work for you given your circumstances, or maybe you have a good thing going. I just want to share it because I, and some others, have found it useful.